Home > Ford Puma - Crash & Safety Tests 2019

Auto
Ford Puma - Crash & Safety Tests 2019

Description

The passenger compartment of the Puma remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of theknees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of differentsizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the driver's chest was rated as marginal. In the full-width rigid barrier test,protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger. In both the side barrier and the moresevere side pole tests, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in both of these tests. Tests on the frontseats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometricassessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systemperformed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided or mitigated in alltest scenarios

Added on the 19/12/2019 08:41:36 - Copyright : Auto Moto EN

To customise your video :

Or Create an account

More videos on the subject

  • Ford Mondeo - Crash & Safety Tests 2019

    The passenger compartment of the Mondeo remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of theknees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of differentsizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequatefor both the driver and rear passenger. In both the side barrier and the more severe side pole tests, protection of all critical body areaswas good and the car scored full points in both of these tests. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protectionagainst whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplashprotection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds atwhich many whiplash injuries occur

    06/12/2019 - Auto Moto EN
  • Ford Kuga - Crash & Safety Tests 2019

    The passenger compartment of the Kuga remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of theknees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of differentsizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the driver's chest and lower leg was rated as marginal. In the full-width rigidbarrier test, protection the driver's chest was again marginal but that of all other critical body areas was good or adequate for both thedriver and rear passenger. In both the side barrier and the more severe side pole tests, protection of all critical body areas was good andthe car scored full points in both of these tests. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection againstwhiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which manywhiplash injuries occur.

    06/12/2019 - Auto Moto EN
  • The Best in Class Cars of 2019

    Euro NCAP publishes its Best in Class for 2019. Fifty-five cars were assessed among which forty-one achieved the top accolade. This makes 2019 one of the most impressive years on record since Euro NCAP started to evaluate consumer safety of cars on the European market. Mercedes-Benz regained its crown in the best performing Small Family Car category. The CLA is the sporty alternative to the A-Class Sedan, the winner of last year’s Best in Class. It achieved a score of more than 90 percent in three of the four areas of safety and delivered the best overall rating of the year. Remarkably, Mercedes-Benz launched five more five-star vehicles in 2019, all with outstanding crash protection and driver assistance technology.

    08/01/2020 - Auto Moto EN
  • MG HS - Crash & Safety Tests 2019

    The passenger compartment of the HS remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the kneesand femurs of both the driver and passenger. MG showed that, with the exception of the underside of the steering column, a similar level ofprotection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test,protection of the driver was good for all critical parts of the body, and was good or adequate for the rear passenger. In the side barrierimpact, all critical body areas were well protected and the HS scored maximum points in this test. In the more severe side pole test,protection of the chest was rated as weak, based on dummy readings of rib compression, while that of other body areas was good. Testson the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. Ageometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB)system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries occur, withcollisions avoided in all test scenarios.

    06/01/2020 - Auto Moto EN
  • Aiways U5 - Crash & Safety Tests 2019

    The passenger compartment of the U5 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the kneesand femurs of the driver and passenger. Aiways showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizesand to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the front passenger was good for all critical body areas. In the full-width rigid barriertest, protection of all critical body regions was good for the driver and good or adequate for the rear passenger. In the side barrier impact,dummy readings indicated good protection of all body areas. However, the side curtain airbag had not deployed as designed, gettingcaught on the interior trim. The score for the driver's head was penalised and its protection rated as adequate. In the more severe sidepole test, high readings of acceleration indicated that the airbag had not protected the head from the intruding structure, and its protectionwas rated as poor. As a result, all points for the pole test were lost. Aiways have since changed the timing of the airbag deployment to tryto address the issue. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of arear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomousemergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, withcollisions avoided in most test scenarios.

    06/01/2020 - Auto Moto EN

More videosAuto