Home > Judge Blocks New York From Enforcing Fine Imposed On Drug Companies

Judge Blocks New York From Enforcing Fine Imposed On Drug Companies


According to a report by Reuters, on Wednesday, a US federal judge blocked New York state from enforcing a recently-enacted law that would force drug manufacturers and distributors to pay a 600 million dollar fine to defray the cost of fighting the widespread opioid epidemic. The ruling reportedly comes amid a trio of lawsuits challenging the law by generic drugmakers group the Association for Accessible Medicines, drug wholesale distributor group Healthcare Distribution Alliance and opioid generics maker Mallinckrodt Plc’s unit SpecGx. AAM said in a statement that while it supported proposals to address the opioid crisis, “legislative proposals must reflect an understanding of the pharmaceutical ecosystem and adhere to the tenets of the U.S. Constitution.”

Added on the 19/12/2018 16:19:37 - Copyright : Wochit

To customise your video :

Or Create an account

More videos on the subject

  • Judge Blocks New York From Enforcing Opioid Surcharge On Companies

    According to Reuters, a Manhattan federal judge on Wednesday blocked the New York state from enforcing a recently enacted law that aimed to collect $600 million from drug manufacturers and distributors. The law hopes to defray the costs of combating the opioid addiction epidemic. The judge said the law improperly regulated the companies’ relationships with out-of-state consumers by barring drugmakers from passing on the costs to them and threatening significant penalties for doing so.

    20/12/2018 - Wochit
  • US Judge Blocks Trump's Health Clinic Rule Associated With Abortion

    A federal judge in Washington blocked President Donald Trump’s new rule. The rule would prohibit taxpayer-funded family planning clinics from referring patients to abortion providers. According to Reuters, abortion supporters refer to it as a “gag rule.” They said it silences doctor-patient communication about abortion options. The judge's ruling will allow clinic to continue providing “quality, unbiased healthcare to women.”

    26/04/2019 - Wochit
  • Judge Rules It's Fine If Unvaccinated Children Mingle In Measles Hot Zone

    A state judge has ruled against one New York county’s effort to stem a massive measles outbreak. In March, Rockland County banned unvaccinated children from public places. According to Splinter, Judge Rolf Thorson stopped the controversial month long ban after just ten days. It mandated fines and short-term jail sentences to parents who allowed unvaccinated children to attend schools, parks, malls, and other public spaces. Rockland County is in the midst of a major medical emergency, with 167 cases of measles confirmed as of Friday. Officials had hoped the extreme measure would spur parents to finally bite the bullet and vaccinate their kids.

    07/04/2019 - Wochit
  • Judge Blocks New York City Law Requiring Airbnb to Hand Over User Data

    According to Reuters, a federal judge on Thursday blocked a New York City law requiring Airbnb to hand over data each month about people who use its apartment listing service. The ruling could be beneficial to the company as it prepares for a widely anticipated initial public offering later this year. In a statement, Airnb said that “The decision today is a huge win for Airbnb and its users, including the thousands of New Yorkers at risk of illegal surveillance who use Airbnb to help make ends meet."

    03/01/2019 - Wochit
  • 'Breast Is Best' For Baby, But Not For Infant Formula Companies

    The number of Americans who breastfeed their children has risen steadily over the past few decade. And according to the Huffington Post, that's a public health win that results in better nutrition and lower health risks for mothers and babies. But this positive development is at odds with the interests of the baby formula industry. Nestle, Abbott, Mead Johnson and Danone are the top four worldwide, and their US sales have flattened in recent years.

    11/08/2018 - Wochit
  • Déconfinement : les motifs de déplacements sont-ils assez précis pour assurer les droits des citoyens ?

    Depuis le 11 mai, les Français ont le droit de se déplacer, dans un rayon de 100 km. Pour les dépasser cette zone, il faut rentrer dans les cas prévus par le décret. Ces dispositions sont-elles assez précises pour assurer les droits des citoyens ? On fait le point avec deux avocats spécialistes des libertés publiques. 

    19/05/2020 - Ouest France - La sélection de la rédaction